The European Super Highway of Debt

These info-graphics shows how much banks borrowed to Portugal, Ireland, Italy, Greece & Spain (PIIGS). Europe is in a deep crisis, and this shows how much must be repaid.

____________________

It’s just mind-boggling. See the human figure at the bottom of the image?

Next to it is a pallet of 100 Million Euros.

Each tractor trailer is loaded with these pallets.

One tractor trailer represents €2,000,000,000 (that’s Billions).

I lost a child to the Occupy movement.

zest-fest:

itsallgone:

Just thirteen days ago I was eight months pregnant.

Everyone loved rubbing my belly.

I even wore my “Baby On Board” shirt over my gigantic stomach.

Read More

This makes me angry

Another source:

http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2011/11/22/pregnant-seattle-protester-miscarries-after-being-kicked-pepper-sprayed/

(via zest-fest-deactivated20111228)

Bam!

In 1982, the National Park Service issued a permit to respondent Community for Creative Non-Violence (CCNV) to conduct a demonstration in Lafayette Park and the Mall, which are National Parks in the heart of Washington, D.C. The purpose of the demonstration was to call attention to the plight of the homeless, and the permit authorized the erection of two symbolic tent cities. However, the Park Service, relying on its regulations — particularly one that permits “camping” (defined as including sleeping activities) only in designated campgrounds, no campgrounds having ever been designated in Lafayette Park or the Mall — denied CCNV’s request that demonstrators be permitted to sleep in the symbolic tents. CCNV and the individual respondents then filed an action in Federal District Court, alleging, inter alia, that application of the regulations to prevent sleeping in the tents violated the First Amendment. The District Court granted summary judgment for the Park Service, but the Court of Appeals reversed.

Held: The challenged application of the Park Service regulations does not violate the First Amendment. Pp. 293-299.

mohandasgandhi:

It’s getting rather exhausting listening to people try to use the Tea Party rallies as some sort of check on the Occupy Wall Street movement in order to demonize it. While the Tea Partiers do have some legitimate political concerns, for the most part, they were and still are pawns. Why was there constant mainstream media coverage of Tea Party demonstrations? Why were there so few incidents of clashes with police and zero arrests? Why were Tea Party protesters who carried guns, many semiautomatic riffles, untouched by law enforcement? Why were they taken so seriously? Why were they hailed as “patriots?” Why weren’t any Tea Party rallies shut down?

Because the Tea Party in no way threatened the establishment. They demanded completely privatized healthcare, eating right out of the hands of Big Pharma and healthcare insurance companies. They protested against corporate and environmental regulations, allowing big business to essentially steamroll over whatever they please, even if that meant destroying our Earth, with zero accountability. They demanded funding for services and programs that generally help the lower classes like Medicaid, employment insurance, Planned Parenthood, etc. be cut in order to “slash the deficit.” After billionaires like the Koch brothers poured money into their groups, they demanded it was unfair to tax big corporations and the rich because “they’re the job makers.” Maybe we should look at some of their corporate and mega-rich sponsors:

  • Massey Energy
  • Microsoft
  • FreedomWorks
  • Americans for Prosperity
  • Armstrong Foundation
  • Carthage Foundation
  • Castle Rock Foundation
  • Claude R. Lambe Charitable Foundation
  • Earhart Foundation
  • Exxon Mobil
  • F.M. Kirby Foundation
  • Gordon and Mary Cain Foundation
  • Jaquelin Hume Foundation
  • John M. Olin Foundation
  • Leadership Institute
  • Philip M. McKenna Foundation
  • Richard and Helen DeVos Foundation
  • Rodney Fund
  • Samuel Roberts Noble Foundation
  • Lynde and Harry Bradley Foundation
  • Sarah Scaife Foundation 
  • British Petroleum
  • Bayer
  • NewsCorp
  • Heritage Foundation
  • Manhattan Institute
  • George C. Marshall Institute
  • Reason Foundation
  • American Enterprise Institute
  • Scaife Family Foundation
  • Shelby Cullom Davis Foundation
  • MetLife
  • Americans for Tax Reform
  • Family Research Council
  • John Birch Society
  • Ensuring Liberty Corp.
  • AT&T
  • Verizon
  • Polaris Consulting
  • Southern Co.
  • Comcast
  • American Airlines
  • Time Warner
  • Kirby Corp.
  • Ernst & Young
  • Publix
  • Caterpillar
  • Fed. of Amer. Hospitals
  • Tyco International

There’s a major incentive to allow the AstroTurf Tea Partiers, which make up only 18% of the population, to stomp their little feet. There is, however, virtually zero incentive to allow the Occupy movement, which denounces such overreaching corporate power, to even open their mouths and let out a single utterance. So, how do you suppress an all-inclusive movement with legitimate and striking concerns regarding the unequal balance of power? You beat them in the streets and try to do everything possible to cut off their resources because your corporate overlords, guys like Bloomberg who made billions by doing business with Wall Street, said, “jump.” Because you’re part of the 40% the top 1% owns. They buy you with their massive amounts of wealth to do their bidding in order to increase that wealth.

I will give these critics of the Occupy movement one thing though: it’s difficult to figure out how the system really works because of how horribly broken it is. However, it doesn’t take a great mind to understand the very fact that it’s broken in the first place or pinpoint who broke it.

npr:

Many of the protesters have retreated to Zuccotti Park this afternoon. The atmosphere is festive with drumming and dancing. But we found Stephen Patti, an 85-year-old World War II vet, sitting at one of the park’s tables. He was wearing an American Legion hat and a serious look on his face. …

“The war is over,” said Patti. “It’s time to negotiate.”

What he means, he said, is that the Occupy Movement has refocused the conversation in the country. It’s brought income inequality to the public discourse, so Patti said the time has come to issue a set of demands, sit down with government, with Wall Street and find a way to close that gap and bring better paying jobs to more people, instead of handing out massive bonuses to a few CEOs.

“You gotta sit down,” he said. “People get tired of this when it disrupts their life. Now is the time to negotiate.”

(Eyder Peralta, reporting from New York for The Two-Way)

mohandasgandhi:

Members of the 1% are clearly at an advantage when it comes to opportunity, and that advantage carries through when it comes to finding a job.

While it’s common for people to find employment through family and friends, there’s a direct correlation between a father’s income and the likelihood his son will work for the same employer, according to a report last year in the Journal of Labor Economics (via Miles Corak, who co-wrote the paper).

The researchers found that that among its subjects, around 40% of young Canadian men had been employed by an employer for whom their father worked.

But for earners in the top percentile, that figure jumps to around nearly 70%.

Writes Corak:

All parents want to help their children in whatever way they can. But top earners can do it more than others, and with more consequence: virtually guaranteeing, if not a lifetime of high earnings, at least a great start in life.

But most rich people work super hard for their money! They deserve it!
nprfreshair:

Today we’re going to talk about how the wealthiest Americans have benefited from certain tax policies over the past 15 years — and how those tax policies have led to greater economic inequality in our country. 

nprfreshair:

Today we’re going to talk about how the wealthiest Americans have benefited from certain tax policies over the past 15 years — and how those tax policies have led to greater economic inequality in our country. 

(via npr)

irisblasi:

In the wake of the NYPD’s destruction of the 5,000+ volumes compromising the OWS Library last night, it’s important to remember: Even burning books can’t stop ideas from catching fire.

(via thecultureofme)